I'm sorry but getting shot behind walls in this game compared to never being shot behind walls (unless it's a wall that can be shot through) in CoD is a huge difference. The netcode on this game is years behind any other FPS to date.
Netcode on CoD is terrible, and you only need to watch a handful of your own killcams to see a massive disparity between how things looked from your perspective and your enemy. The interpolation is miles out of whack.
Magic bullets are absolutely everywhere, especially when the game pushes you onto a 12hz listening server.
You can find endless complaints about the netcode on reddit and the forums. Here's an example:
And how does this “bullet sponge” compare to what ironsight has/had?
"the only thing REALLY better in COD are the graphics."
I'd say the graphics, weapon customisation, challenges and the slide action are things that are an improvement over IS.
In every other respect: gun play, map design, movement, core gameplay.. hell, even the netcode, IS is better.
Modern warfare is a very pretty game, with a lot of options, but the actual basic gameplay experience is really quite bad.
IS is a much more basic game, but the core gameplay experience is streets ahead of MW.
No no its not streets ahead its 10 blocks back. CoD already has “been there and done that“ with with ironsight has.
You dont know how to play the new CoD and yet you conclude the gameplay is bad. This new CoD is now based on more realistic functions. You slide, sprint, tactical sprint, peek, and enchanted mechanics to help players be more aggressive. Like i said before if humans are scared to adapt to new things but that doesnt mean that its bad.
I can guarantee you the activision can patch the bugs and have 2 dlc released by the end of summer and for ironsight prob 3 patches by next year and thats being generous. Yet ironsight just need a very old gpu but even modern generation of gpu cannot run the game much better. This doesnt make ironsight any much better.
So you work at Activision? Jokes aside, I hope you're right 'cos I bought COD and it runs so bad I uninstalled it Discussing which game is better is a waste of time 'cos that's a matter of taste, but my opinion is that the only thing REALLY better in COD are the graphics. Ironsight has more weapons, more charachter customization options... not saying Ironsight is better 'cos of these things, just stating some facts. Another fact is that the killstreak system makes people camp a lot more in order to get them, which ruins the game for me. CODMW is very realistic, players are so afraid of dying they won't even move. Yeah all fps games have campers, but this is on another level...
that is what makes it realistic. Search and destroy always have players camping. If you want to play aggressively then play it smartly. Campers can always be killed by grenades, flanking, explosives, ambushing. You saying that you dont even care about trying to solve the issue with what the game offers and just make the conclusion that its a whole new level of camping.
When i play cod on console, i barely get killed by campers and i average 1.3 per match. YOU CHECK YOUR CORNERS. Dropshot anyone that you got jumpscared by. Lob a c4 over. Use an UAV or detection grenades. Follow your teammate so he gets killed and you kill the camper. Its not that hard.